Mastering the Art of Jury Selection: A Comprehensive Guide for Attorneys

When it comes to litigation, one of the most critical stages is jury selection. The composition of the jury can significantly influence the outcome of a case. This comprehensive guide aims to provide attorneys with the necessary insights and strategies to effectively conduct jury selection, ensuring a fair and unbiased jury for their clients.

Understanding the Basics of Jury Selection

The jury selection process, also known as voir dire, is a critical phase in both civil and criminal trials. It provides attorneys with the opportunity to evaluate potential jurors and remove those who might be biased or unable to judge the case impartially.

Primary Objective of Jury Selection

The primary objective of jury selection is to assemble a fair and impartial jury. According to the Code of Civil Procedure (CCP § 220), a trial jury generally consists of 12 persons. However, in civil actions and cases of misdemeanors, the number can be less if the parties agree.

Challenges during Jury Selection

During jury selection, attorneys can challenge potential jurors based on different grounds. These challenges fall into two primary categories:

1. Challenge for Cause

These challenges are based on a juror’s lack of qualifications, incapacity, or bias. They can further be divided into:

  • General Disqualification: This occurs if a juror lacks any of the qualifications prescribed by the code to render a person competent as a juror, or if any incapacity prevents the juror from performing their duties without prejudice to the substantial rights of any party (CCP § 228).
  • Implied Bias: This arises when a juror’s relationship or prior interaction with the parties or the case could imply bias. Examples include a familial relationship, business association, or previous involvement in a similar case (CCP § 229).
  • Actual Bias: This refers to a state of mind that prevents the juror from acting with complete impartiality. It could stem from enmity towards, or favoritism for, any party (CCP § 225).

2. Peremptory Challenges

These are objections to jurors that can be made without giving any reason. In a civil case, each party has the right to a predetermined number of peremptory challenges, usually six (CCP § 231).

Key Strategies for Effective Jury Selection

An effective jury selection involves a systematic approach, a thorough understanding of jury biases, and the ability to ask the right questions.

1. Preparing a Written Jury Questionnaire

A well-crafted jury questionnaire can provide attorneys with valuable insights into potential jurors’ backgrounds, beliefs, and biases. It allows attorneys to identify potential issues even before oral voir dire begins.

2. Conducting an Initial Chambers Conference

Before the voir dire, attorneys should have a discussion with the judge about the form and subject matter of voir dire questions. This meeting provides an opportunity to clarify any concerns and set the tone for the jury selection process.

3. Evaluating Jury Questionnaires

Once the jury questionnaires are filled out, attorneys should thoroughly review the responses to identify any potential challenges for cause or determine which jurors might be more favorable to their case.

4. Conducting Voir Dire

During voir dire, attorneys have the opportunity to question potential jurors orally. This process allows for a more in-depth evaluation of jurors and the chance to establish a rapport. When conducting voir dire, attorneys should aim for a probing and liberal examination to uncover potential bias or prejudice (California Rules of Court Standard 3.25(a)).

5. Exercising Challenges

In the final step of the jury selection process, attorneys exercise their challenges, either for cause or peremptory, to remove unsuitable jurors. It’s essential for attorneys to strategize their challenges effectively, prioritizing those jurors who pose the most significant risk of bias.

Understanding Juror Bias

One of the most complex aspects of jury selection is identifying and addressing juror bias. Juror biases are preconceived notions or prejudices that can affect a juror’s ability to fairly evaluate the evidence and reach an impartial verdict.

Common Types of Juror Bias

Several common types of juror bias can impact a trial, including:

  1. Personal Responsibility Bias: This occurs when jurors believe that individuals should take personal responsibility for their actions and therefore may be less likely to find in favor of a plaintiff who they perceive as trying to shift blame.
  2. Anti-Plaintiff Bias: Some jurors may harbor a bias against plaintiffs, particularly in personal injury lawsuits, viewing them as opportunistic or litigious.
  3. Stuff Happens Bias: This bias is based on the belief that accidents or unfortunate events are just part of life and should not necessarily result in legal action.
  4. Suspicion Bias: Jurors with this bias may be suspicious of the motives behind a lawsuit, viewing it as a scheme concocted by lawyers and their clients to defraud the defendant or insurance companies.
  5. Victimization Bias: This bias involves jurors who believe that the legal system is being exploited, and litigation costs are crippling our economy.

Strategies for addressing these biases will be discussed in the following sections.

Crafting Effective Voir Dire Questions

A crucial part of the jury selection process is the crafting of effective voir dire questions. These questions should be designed to elicit honest responses from potential jurors about their backgrounds, experiences, and potential biases.

Types of Voir Dire Questions

Voir dire questions can be either open-ended or closed-ended. Open-ended questions allow jurors to provide more detailed responses and can help attorneys discover underlying attitudes or biases. Closed-ended questions can be used to confirm specific details or beliefs.

Open-Ended Questions

Open-ended questions allow jurors to provide more detailed responses and can help attorneys discover underlying attitudes or biases. For instance, an attorney could ask, “Can you describe any personal experiences that might influence your perception of this case?”

Closed-Ended Questions

Closed-ended questions can be used to confirm specific details or beliefs. For instance, an attorney could ask, “Have you or a family member ever been involved in a similar lawsuit?”

Strategies for Asking Voir Dire Questions

When conducting voir dire, it’s crucial for attorneys to:

  1. Be Prepared: Attorneys should come to voir dire with a list of potential questions tailored to the specifics of their case. They should be ready to adapt their questions based on the responses they receive.
  2. Listen Actively: Attorneys must pay close attention to jurors’ responses and body language. Active listening can help attorneys pick up on subtle cues about jurors’ attitudes and biases.
  3. Follow Up: If a juror’s response raises potential concerns, attorneys should not hesitate to ask follow-up questions to clarify the juror’s stance.
  4. Be Respectful: It’s essential for attorneys to show respect for jurors throughout the voir dire process. This respect can help to establish rapport and ensure that jurors feel comfortable expressing their honest opinions.

Selecting Alternate Jurors

In cases where the trial is expected to be protracted, the court may call alternate jurors. They are drawn from the same source and in the same manner as the original jurors, subject to the same examination and challenges. The alternate jurors are supposed to be present at all times during the trial and are bound by the same court orders as the original jurors. However, they are not allowed to participate in the deliberation unless ordered by the court (CCP § 234).

In conclusion, jury selection is a nuanced and vital aspect of the litigation process. Attorneys who master these strategies and understand the importance of each step in the process will be better equipped to select a fair and impartial jury, increasing their chances of a favorable outcome for their clients. Remember, the objective is not to select jurors who will favor your side, but to eliminate those who may be biased against your client.

Legal Disclaimer: The content of this blog post is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The information provided herein should not be relied upon as a substitute for professional legal counsel. If you are seeking legal advice or representation, please consult with an attorney.

Practice Areas
Client Testimonials

I felt as if Mr. Arns and I had known one another for years his representation was concern for my well being with the pursuit of justice as well as compassion ,if you want to be treated like a human being not a pay check go and see Mr. Arns and his firm, you’ll leave with a smile on your face and equality in you’re heart

A. F.

Google Review

The only one law firm that cares for injured people. Thanks to this lawyers l got what l should gotten nine years ago they are the best in the bay area. Thank you and God bless you guys.

R. R.

Google Review



San Francisco Trail Lawyers Association
Alameda Contra Costa
Consumer Attorneys Cali
Cali Applicants Attorneys
American Board of Trial Advocates